tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20600336.post114047068003987172..comments2024-01-15T10:29:29.411-05:00Comments on Slave of the Word: Rankin and InerrancyDavid A. Croteauhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15809705774955230769noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20600336.post-1140574647409788922006-02-21T21:17:00.000-05:002006-02-21T21:17:00.000-05:00I was actually trying to make a subtle point about...I was actually trying to make a subtle point about "DR" Rankin. It seems to have been received.Mark Owenshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07145877997591508836noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20600336.post-1140530774308366762006-02-21T09:06:00.000-05:002006-02-21T09:06:00.000-05:00Good point Alan ... while most in the SBC may not ...Good point Alan ... while most in the SBC may not define themselves as cessationists ... they may not even know what it means ... they are pragmatic cessationists and I would think they would not want to support those speaking in tongues: privately or corporately.<BR/><BR/>Furthermore, I understand what you are getting at with the 'spirit' of what he said. I read that thing abou 5 times. I've never heard the man speak before, but he doesn't seem to well at the word getting out of the mouth of him, thing ... that is, he was kind of confusing.David A. Croteauhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15809705774955230769noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20600336.post-1140492053427475022006-02-20T22:20:00.000-05:002006-02-20T22:20:00.000-05:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Alan Bandyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09631479580408195078noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20600336.post-1140491618467833212006-02-20T22:13:00.000-05:002006-02-20T22:13:00.000-05:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Alan Bandyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09631479580408195078noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20600336.post-1140487493709270542006-02-20T21:04:00.000-05:002006-02-20T21:04:00.000-05:00Rankin says:"because I believe in the inerrancy of...Rankin says:<BR/>"because I believe in the inerrancy of the Scripture, that the Scripture's eternally relevant, that, you know as long as the Holy Spirit is operable in our lives and in the church and in the world, you know, what the Bible tells about the work and functioning of the Holy Spirit is applicable."<BR/><BR/>Is it just me or this not the doctrine of inerrancy we learned in Seminary?<BR/><BR/>BTW, welcome to the blogosphere, David:-) You might be interested in this blog: <BR/>free-grace.blogspot.com<BR/><BR/><BR/>Blessings,<BR/>MOMark Owenshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07145877997591508836noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20600336.post-1140487402486897292006-02-20T21:03:00.000-05:002006-02-20T21:03:00.000-05:00Exactly my point! According to Rankin, I'm not an ...Exactly my point! According to Rankin, I'm not an inerrantist?!?! No wonder he's got people gunning for him. He just called most of the SBC 'errantists'.David A. Croteauhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15809705774955230769noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20600336.post-1140484411572879672006-02-20T20:13:00.000-05:002006-02-20T20:13:00.000-05:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Alan Bandyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09631479580408195078noreply@blogger.com