“But how would the Pope have allowed them [i.e., tithe-free lands] to be held by laymen, if, by divine right, (as they stupidly prate,) they had been the sacred inheritance of the clergy? In conclusion, inasmuch as tithes are to be counted against public imposts and tributes, let not private individuals refuse to pay them, unless they wish to destroy the political state and government of kingdoms; but let pious princes take care to correct abuses, so the idle bellies may not devour public revenues which are devoted to the Church.”[2]I have concluded that Calvin was ambiguous in his writings on tithing … but what about others in Geneva …
NOTES:
[1] Calvin, Commentaries on the Twelve Minor Prophets, 5:586.
[2] John Calvin, Commentaries on the Four Last Books of Moses Arranged in the Form of a Harmony, 4 vols., trans. Charles William Bingham (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1999), 280.
Further research:
For comments by Calvin that appear to allude to tithing being obligatory, see John Calvin, Commentaries on the Four Last Books of Moses Arranged in the Form of a Harmony, 4 vols., trans. Charles William Bingham (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1999), 2:279.
For comments that appeared to say tithes are not obligatory, see John Calvin, Commentary on the Epistles of Paul the Apostle to the Corinthians, 2 vols., trans. John Pringle (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1999), 1:298–300, 2:70, 294, 308; Calvin, Twelve Minor Prophets, 5:586; Calvin, Four Last Books of Moses, 2:278–80; John Calvin, Commentaries on the First Book of Moses Called Genesis, 2 vols., trans. John King (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1999), 1:393.
No comments:
Post a Comment